Through collaboration, we can
maximize benefits to everyone
that each project touches
Each city and county's
comprehensive general plan
sets forth that community's
goals, policies
and programs
for land use
and development
Through zoning ordinances,
cities and counties
translate
their
comprehensive general
plans
into law
City and county ordinances guide and control the subdivision of land
The California Environmental Quality Act requires city and
county agencies to assess
each development project's environmental impact
The California Coastal Commission protects, conserves, restores and enhances the California coast
Gaining city or county approval
for a complex development
project is a multi-phase process
At community meetings with Aurora and at public hearings, you have the opportunity to shape the design of a project
Economic feasibility both
constrains and liberates the
design of a project.
Aurora holds its employees, consultants, architects, engineers, contractors, subcontractors and marketing representatives to the highest standards
How real-estate development projects are designed and built today will largely determine how we live, work and play in the future
Contact Aurora:
Maria Etoile
Director of Planning
maria.etoile@auroracompanies.com
(917) 817-8659
The Aurora Companies
1492 Mesa Street, Suite 1000
La Jolla, CA 92039
Glossary of California land-use
and planning terms
Land use and development
links and publications
site writer
webmaster
|
|
Each city and county's
comprehensive general plan
sets forth that community's
goals, policies
and programs
for land use
and development
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people.
Amendment X of U.S. Constitution
When most of us read the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution, zoning laws are not the first thing to come to mind. Nor when we're searching for a public path to a beach through a real estate development are we likely to reflect upon our right to such a path as being linked to the Bill of Rights. Yet the power of cities and counties to regulate land use and real estate development through zoning ordinances flows from the tenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
The tenth amendment confers police power upon the states. Police power is the right and obligation of a government to protect the health, safety and general welfare of citizens.
Most states have enacted legislation that gives city and county governments the authority to regulate land use and real estate development for purposes of health, safety and general welfare.
The courts consistently have upheld the right of local governments to regulate land use and development so long as, in adopting and administering regulations, they establish a legitimate public interest and follow due process.
Courts have interpreted health, safety and general welfare to cover a wide range of concerns.
Governments may legally curtail or prohibit development to preserve flood plains, wetlands, sand dunes and habitats of endangered species. They may restrict the density or height of development to protect erodible hillsides, mountain views, access to beaches, solar access and other public interests. They can ban nuisances to nearby residents.
The mainstays of local governments’ regulatory programs are comprehensive general plans, zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations and capital-improvement programs. Communities may adopt additional measures to manage growth and development.
Planning is the process of deciding how a community uses its land and other resources. Local and state laws define the process for making planning decisions.
In California, the state delegates most local land use and development decisions to cities and counties. State law requires that each incorporated city and county adopt "a comprehensive, long-term general plan for [its] physical development."
A city or county's comprehensive general plan describes the community's goals and policies for land use and development. It lays out implementation programs for how the goals and policies are to be put into action.
A comprehensive general plan:
 |
Designates the general location and density of housing, business, industry, open space, public buildings and grounds, waste disposal facilities and other land uses. |
 |
Identifies the general location and extent of existing and proposed major roads, transit routes, terminals and public utilities and facilities. |
 |
Assesses current and projected housing needs for all economic segments of the community and region. Sets forth local housing policies and programs to implement those policies. |
 |
Addresses the conservation, development and use of natural resources including water, forests, soils, rivers and mineral deposits. |
 |
Details plans and measures for preserving open-space for natural resources, outdoor recreation, public health and safety and for agriculture. |
 |
Identifies and appraises noise problems. |
 |
Establishes policies to protect the community from natural and manmade hazards, e.g., seismic, geologic, flood, wildfire and toxic- materials hazards. |
In the comprehensive general plan, maps and diagrams illustrate land uses, roads, environmental hazard locations, open spaces and other aspects of the general plan.
A comprehensive general plan also may address issues of local interest such as air quality, recreation, community design or public facilities.
A comprehensive general plan is the foundation for land use decisions made by the planning commission, city council or board of supervisors.
Working from their comprehensive general plans, cities and counties create community plans and specific plans. A community plan focuses planning efforts on a smaller area or neighborhood.
Specific plans describe allowable land uses, identify open spaces and describe the available infrastructure. In some jurisdictions, specific plans also take the place of zoning.
Adopting or amending general plans and specific plans requires public hearings. Through these public hearings, you and the organization you represent can influence your city or county's expressed goals policies and programs for land use and development.
To explain planning in California, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) publishes California Planning Guide: An Introduction to Planning in California.
To guide city and county planning, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research publishes State of California General Plan Guidelines.
The California Land Use Planning Network (LUPIN) gives you quick access to your city or county's general plan.
Further reading
Guide to California Planning by William J. Fulton and Paul Shigley
Curtin's California Land Use and Planning Law by Cecily T. Talbert
Real Estate Development: Principles and Process by Mike E. Miles, Gayle Berens, Mark Eppli and Mark A. Weiss
|
Milestones in
California’s Planning Law |
| 1907 |
California legislature enacts first Subdivision Map Act. |
| 1915 |
California legislature authorizes cities to create planning commissions. |
| 1917 |
Cities enact initial zoning laws. |
| 1927 |
California legislature authorizes cities and counties to prepare master plans (general plans). |
| 1929 |
California legislature makes adoption of master plans mandatory for those cities and counties establishing planning commissions (based largely on the 1928 U.S. Department of Commerce Model Standard City Planning Enabling Act). California legislature revises Subdivision Map Act to enable local governments to require dedication of improvements. |
| 1937 |
California legislature requires all cities and counties to adopt master plans. Authorizes cities and counties to prepare “precise plans” (similar to specific plans of today) to implement the master plan. |
| 1953 |
California legislature recodifies planning law into Government Code §65000, et seq. |
| 1955 |
California legislature requires land use and circulation elements to be in the general plan. |
| 1965 |
California legislature reorganizes Planning and Zoning Law. Authorizes cities and counties to prepare “specific plans.”
To promote voluntary land conservation, particularly farmland conservation. California legislature passes the Williamson Act (officially, the California Land Conservation Act of 1965). Act gives owners of farmland and open-space land relief of property tax in exchange for a ten-year agreement that the land will not be developed or otherwise converted to another use. |
| 1967 |
California legislature requires housing element in the general plan (effective July 1, 1969). |
| 1970 |
California legislature requires conservation and open-space elements in the general plan. Passes California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) |
| 1971 |
California legislature requires safety, seismic safety, noiseand scenic highway elements in the general plan. Requires zoning and subdivision approvals to be consistent with the adopted general plan. |
| 1972 |
California Proposition 20, the Coastal Initiative, establishes the Coastal Commission "to protect, conserve, restoreand enhance the environment of the California coastline." |
| 1973 |
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) issues first General Plan Guidelines. |
| 1974 |
California legislature recodifies Subdivision Map Act from the Business and Professions Code into the State Planning and Zoning Law within the Government Code. |
| 1975 |
California legislature clarifies statute on general plans’ internal consistency. |
| 1976 |
Through California Coastal Act, California legislature extends the Coastal Commission's authority indefinitely. |
| 1980 |
California legislature adds detailed content standards and adoption procedures to the housing element requirement. Appeals court says public works must be consistent with general plans (Friends of B Street). |
| 1982 |
Appeals court says land use and circulation elements must correlate (Twaine Harte). |
| 1984 |
California legislature substantially revises Planning statutes. Requires seismic safety and scenic highways elements dropped as required elements. Merges seismic safety with safety element. |
| 1985 |
Through Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act, California legislature establishes a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) in each county to encourage and provide "planned, well-ordered, efficient urban development patterns with appropriate consideration of preserving open-space lands within those patterns." |
| 1990 |
California Supreme Court says zoning in conflict with the general plan is invalid (Lesher v. Walnut Creek). |
| 1990 |
California Supreme Court says zoning in conflict with the general plan is invalid (Lesher v. Walnut Creek). In Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors, the California Supreme Court ruled that the general plan is the "constitution for all future development within the city or county" and noted that local agencies must review and revise their general plans to keep them current. |
| 1995 |
California Supreme Court holds in DeVita v. Napa County that the authority to amend a general plan is not limited solely to a city council or county board of supervisorsand extends to voters via initiative. |
| 2001 |
California legislature requires General Plan Guidelines to include environmental justice. |
| Milestones adapted primarily from State of California General Plan Guidelines 2003 |
|